The legacy of nuclear testing and Chernobyl
Editorial revision 2026
Underground atomic test in French Polynesia
One of the last French underground nuclear tests around 1995. Water from the lagoon of Mururoa Atoll in French Polynesia suffered the shock wave from the basement. Unlike atmospheric tests or serious reactor accidents, underground tests do not directly release radioactive material. The radioactivity is contained in principle in depth, but contamination can occur on the surface if the rock is cracked.
© CEA/DAM
Part of the radioactivity in the environment today is due to significant releases of radioactive material occurred in the past. These releases are somehow accidental, because they are not natural but anthropological. Some are deliberate: that is the releases in air of radioactive materials due to the tests of atomic and thermonuclear bombs of the fifties and sixties. Others, involuntary, are due to real accidents : the main accidents are the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and the Fukushima one in 2011.
Temporal evolution of radionuclide concentrations in air (1959–2018). Source: Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), France.
During this half-century atmosphere of mutual deterrence that was the Cold War, nuclear weapon, a symbol of power, was the tool of this deterrence. The great powers proceeded to many tests of atomic bombs and H bombs. At the beginning of the Cold War, the tests were carried out in air, far from inhabited places in principle. The United States have conducted many tests in the Nevada desert, then on Pacific atolls. The most famous site was that of the Bikini atoll which had been emptied of its inhabitants. France has used for its first tests in 1959-60, the firing site of Reggane in the Sahara, English used the Australian desert, and Chinese the Gobi desert. These atmospheric tests stopped in 1981. Treaties now ban them.
Atmospheric tests released radioactive dust carried by winds that have spread across the globe. They have given rise to a population exposure and contamination of the food chain by some radioisotopes. However, given their radioactive period, most of them have completely disappeared. Remain essentially caesium-137 (period 30 years), strontium-90 (28.6 years) and, to a lesser degree, krypton-85 (a noble gas of period 10.7 years) and tritium (12.3 years period). Traces of americium-241 are still found in small but significant. This radioelement, which was not dispersed during the Chernobyl accident, is an indication of these tests done very far and long ago.
The underground nuclear tests have been cleaner, fission products being in principle confined underground. But there is a risk that by cracking and the action of water, some rise to the surface. France conducted its last underground test in 1995 on the atoll of Mururoa. Nuclear tests were still carried out in 1999 by India and Pakistan, and possibly more recently by North Korea.
The radioactivity of fission products…
Radioactive materials released by an atomic explosion differ from those of a reactor accident. During a nuclear explosion, fission has just occurred: fresh fragments are released. These fragments are extremely radioactive due to very short half-lives, such as these of the fragment cascade at 143 nucleons of the figure. During a reactor accident, most of fission products are several months or years old. The radioelements left over come from cascades containing a long-lived radionuclide such as strontiun-90 with a 29 year half-life. The presence of short lived radioisotopes like iodine-131, with a period of eight days, comes from recent fissions.
© IN2P3
A disaster such as the explosion at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 1986 released a significant amount of radioactive material (estimated activity released: 12 × 10¹⁸ Bq) near a major city. The nature of the Chernobyl fallout was similar to that of an atmospheric nuclear test.
Ukrainians and Belarusians were by far the most exposed populations. In the first few days after the accident, the most hazardous exposure was due to short-lived iodine isotopes, particularly iodine-131. After iodine-131 had decayed, the main long-term legacy was contamination from deposits of cesium-137.
Disparition of 2 main fission products : iodine-131 and Caesium-137
This graph shows the evolution of the activity of the two main radioactive releases from Chernobyl: iodine-131 and cesium-137. It illustrates the effect of their very different half-lives on the evolution of their activity after being dispersed.
Because of its short half-life of 8 days, iodine-131 was highly active and predominated in the early stages, but disappeared after about 3 months. Cesium-137 is less active due to its 30-year half-life, and its activity has decreased by slightly more than half since the accident.
(NB: Logarithmic scales are used to represent the very large variations in activity and the wide time range.)
© IN2P3
For a country such as France, the effects were greatly reduced by the distance. However, various mechanisms may have caused radioactivity to become concentrated locally. In France, higher concentrations were observed after the accident in the Mercantour and Écrins mountain ranges in the Southern Alps.
The Alps were more heavily contaminated because the mountainous terrain intercepted the radioactive cloud, which was located at an altitude of 1,500–3,000 metres. Rainfall then washed radioactive material out of the atmosphere. Cesium atoms accumulated in lower-lying areas as a result of water runoff, contributing to localized concentrations of radioactivity.
Modeling of the Chernobyl radioactive plume over Europe (May 1, 1986). © 2022 IRSN / CNRS-IN2P3. Source:
Articles on the subject « Accidental Releases »
Atomic bombs legacy
The distant legacy of the Cold War Editorial review 2026 A legacy of the Cold War and the [...]
Atmospheric Releases
Radioactive air pollution after a major accident Editorial review 2026 During a major nuclear acc[...]
Risks of ground deposits
The two modes of deposition: dry and wet deposition Editorial review 2026 In everyday life, away [...]
Risks of Internal Exposure
After an accident: What impact on food and humans? Editorial review 2026 A large amount of radioa[...]
Exposition modes (accident)
What are the exposition pathways after a major accident ? Editorial revision 2026 What is the imp[...]